What limitations did Flowout encounter with Webflow's video hosting?

Published on
September 22, 2023

Flowout encountered several limitations with Webflow's video hosting:

  1. Limited storage: Webflow has a limited amount of storage space available for video hosting. This means that if Flowout had a large number of videos or if the videos were large in file size, they may have quickly reached the storage limit. This can be a constraint for businesses or individuals who have a constantly growing library of videos.

  2. Limited upload size: Flowout may have experienced limitations with the maximum file size allowed for video uploads on Webflow. This can be problematic if they needed to upload high-resolution or long-duration videos that exceeded the platform's upload size limit.

  3. Lack of advanced video management features: Webflow's video hosting feature is relatively basic and lacks some advanced video management capabilities. For example, Flowout may have found it challenging to organize and categorize their videos into different collections or playlists. Additionally, they may have encountered difficulties in setting up video thumbnails, captions, or interactive elements within the videos.

  4. Limited streaming options: Webflow's video hosting may have constraints with streaming options, such as bitrate control or adaptive streaming. This can impact the video quality and user experience, especially for viewers with limited internet bandwidth or on mobile devices.

  5. Lack of monetization options: Flowout may have wished to monetize their videos through options like pay-per-view or subscriptions. However, Webflow's video hosting does not provide built-in features for monetization, which could have been a limitation for Flowout's business model.

  6. No built-in analytics: Webflow's video hosting lacks robust analytics tools to track video engagement, calculate view counts, or measure other key metrics. Flowout may have wanted to gather insights on how their videos were performing, but without these analytics, they would have needed to rely on external tracking tools.

  7. No live streaming support: If Flowout wanted to livestream events or broadcasts, Webflow's video hosting does not support this feature. They would have needed to explore alternative platforms or integrate with third-party livestreaming services.

In view of these limitations, Flowout may have had to explore other video hosting solutions or consider integrating third-party video hosting platforms into their Webflow website to overcome these constraints.

Potential additional questions:

  1. How can I integrate third-party video hosting platforms with Webflow?
  2. What are the recommended video formats and specifications for Webflow's video hosting?
  3. Are there any workarounds or alternatives for livestreaming on Webflow?