Is Webflow considering migrating to a GraphQL API instead of the REST based one? If not, why not?

Webflow's API Architecture

Currently, Webflow provides a robust API that allows developers to interact with their projects, collections, and other data programmatically. The current API is based on RESTful principles and offers a wide range of functionality and flexibility. However, as of now, Webflow has not announced any plans to migrate from a RESTful API to GraphQL.

Webflow's Stance on GraphQL

While GraphQL has gained popularity in recent years, it does not necessarily mean that every company or service should migrate to it. As a popular and widely-used CMS and website builder, Webflow has its reasons for sticking with the RESTful API architecture. These reasons could include:

1. Compatibility: Webflow's existing RESTful API infrastructure is well-established and widely adopted by developers. Migrating to GraphQL would require significant time, effort, and resources to ensure backward compatibility, which might disrupt the existing integrations and workflows built around the RESTful API.

2. Maturity and Stability: Webflow's RESTful API has been in use for a considerable amount of time and has proven to be stable and reliable. GraphQL, while growing in popularity, is still relatively newer and may not have the same tested stability and maturity.

3. Developer Community: Webflow has an active and thriving developer community that has been using and interacting with the RESTful API. The familiarity and expertise with the current API architecture make it convenient for developers to continue building on top of it.

4. Performance Considerations: RESTful APIs are known for their performance and efficiency, as they allow clients to request only the specific resources they need. By contrast, GraphQL can result in over-fetching or under-fetching of data, potentially impacting performance. Webflow might prioritize the efficient transfer of data without unnecessary overhead.

5. Incremental Improvements: Webflow has been continuously improving its existing RESTful API, adding new features and endpoints based on user feedback and needs. Instead of a complete overhaul, Webflow can focus on enhancing and expanding the RESTful API without undergoing the complexities of migrating to GraphQL.

While GraphQL has its benefits, including efficient data fetching and the ability to request specific data structures, it is important to understand that the decision to migrate depends on various factors, including compatibility, stability, performance considerations, and the existing developer ecosystem. Webflow seems to be content with its RESTful API and might continue investing in its enhancement rather than completely transitioning to GraphQL.

Additional Questions:

1. Can I use Webflow's existing RESTful API for custom integrations?
2. Are there any limitations to the current Webflow API architecture?
3. What are the benefits of GraphQL over RESTful APIs for web development?